Liquid Penetrant Testing (PT) โ Level 1 Certification Course - Defect Types and Discontinuity Recognition
Evaluation is the process of determining whether an indication is acceptable or not based on applicable criteria.
Interpreting indication type and size
Checking location and orientation
Comparing with standards or drawings
Determining accept or reject
โ PT evaluation is not just visual interpretation โ it must be based on defined acceptance limits.
As a Level 1 PT inspector, your job is to:
Perform the inspection
Identify and record indications
Report indications to Level 2 or higher for evaluation
You are not authorized to make accept/reject decisions unless explicitly written into a company procedure or authorized by a Level 2.
โ Accurate and complete reporting ensures proper evaluation.
Evaluation is based on industry codes, standards, or client requirements. Common references include:
| Standard | Application Area |
|---|---|
| CGSB 48.9712 | Canadian general industry and aerospace |
| ASME Section V | Pressure vessels and piping |
| API 1104 | Pipelines and welds |
| NAS 410 / EN4179 | Aerospace component inspection |
| Company-specific | May define stricter criteria |
| Flaw Type | Maximum Acceptable Length |
|---|---|
| Linear indication | 6 mm |
| Rounded | 3 mm (isolated) |
| Cluster of pores | Not acceptable if dense |
๐ Indications below threshold = acceptable, those above = rejectable
Measurements should be taken using:
Rulers or measuring tapes (for length, width)
Templates or comparators (for radius or angle)
Image overlays (if digital photos are used)
UV light intensity meters (to ensure valid inspection conditions)
โ Measurements must be repeatable and objective.
Your report should include all required information for:
Traceability (who did what, when, and on which part)
Evaluation (all indications noted clearly)
Audit compliance (with code, procedure, or client requirements)
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Part/serial number | Identification of inspected item |
| Inspection method | PT โ Visible or Fluorescent |
| Penetrant system used | Type, Method, Manufacturer |
| Inspector name & cert level | e.g., H. Nejjahi โ PT Level 1 |
| Date/time of inspection | e.g., 2025-07-29, 10:45 AM |
| Dwell time and developer info | e.g., 15 min / NAWD Spray |
| Indications found | Type, size, location |
| Evaluation result | Accept or Refer to Level 2 |
| Remarks/observations | Any rework, cleaning, or retesting |
๐ Attach supporting files: photos, sketches, UV meter readings, etc.
| Error | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Missing data (e.g., dwell time) | Audit failure, reinspection |
| Incorrect part ID | Traceability failure |
| Ambiguous descriptions | Misinterpretation by evaluator |
| Failure to report an indication | Undetected defect โ potential failure |
| Mixing observation and opinion | Reporting must be factual, not suggestive |
โ Stick to what you see, not what you think it might be.
Level 1 inspectors identify and report, not evaluate
Acceptance criteria come from codes, standards, or client specs
Use tools to measure and describe indications clearly
Maintain complete, clear, and traceable inspection reports
Your report is the foundation for decision-making and certification