Evaluation Criteria and Reporting Requirements

Liquid Penetrant Testing (PT) โ€“ Level 1 Certification Course - Defect Types and Discontinuity Recognition

Self-paced
Lesson 3 of 3

๐Ÿ“‹ Section 1: The Evaluation Process in PT

Evaluation is the process of determining whether an indication is acceptable or not based on applicable criteria.

Evaluation Includes:

  • Interpreting indication type and size

  • Checking location and orientation

  • Comparing with standards or drawings

  • Determining accept or reject

โœ… PT evaluation is not just visual interpretation โ€” it must be based on defined acceptance limits.


๐Ÿ”„ Section 2: The Role of the Level 1 Inspector

As a Level 1 PT inspector, your job is to:

  • Perform the inspection

  • Identify and record indications

  • Report indications to Level 2 or higher for evaluation

You are not authorized to make accept/reject decisions unless explicitly written into a company procedure or authorized by a Level 2.


The Reporting Chain:

pgsql
Level 1 Inspector โ†’ Records indication โ†’ Submits to Level 2 โ†’ Evaluates per code

โœ… Accurate and complete reporting ensures proper evaluation.


๐Ÿ“ Section 3: Acceptance and Rejection Criteria

Evaluation is based on industry codes, standards, or client requirements. Common references include:

StandardApplication Area
CGSB 48.9712Canadian general industry and aerospace
ASME Section VPressure vessels and piping
API 1104Pipelines and welds
NAS 410 / EN4179Aerospace component inspection
Company-specificMay define stricter criteria

Sample Criteria (CGSB Example):

Flaw TypeMaximum Acceptable Length
Linear indication6 mm
Rounded3 mm (isolated)
Cluster of poresNot acceptable if dense

๐Ÿ“Œ Indications below threshold = acceptable, those above = rejectable


๐Ÿ“ท Section 4: Indication Measurements

Measurements should be taken using:

  • Rulers or measuring tapes (for length, width)

  • Templates or comparators (for radius or angle)

  • Image overlays (if digital photos are used)

  • UV light intensity meters (to ensure valid inspection conditions)

โœ… Measurements must be repeatable and objective.


๐Ÿงพ Section 5: Reporting Requirements

Your report should include all required information for:

  • Traceability (who did what, when, and on which part)

  • Evaluation (all indications noted clearly)

  • Audit compliance (with code, procedure, or client requirements)


A Complete PT Report Typically Includes:

FieldDescription
Part/serial numberIdentification of inspected item
Inspection methodPT โ€“ Visible or Fluorescent
Penetrant system usedType, Method, Manufacturer
Inspector name & cert levele.g., H. Nejjahi โ€“ PT Level 1
Date/time of inspectione.g., 2025-07-29, 10:45 AM
Dwell time and developer infoe.g., 15 min / NAWD Spray
Indications foundType, size, location
Evaluation resultAccept or Refer to Level 2
Remarks/observationsAny rework, cleaning, or retesting

๐Ÿ“Ž Attach supporting files: photos, sketches, UV meter readings, etc.


๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Section 6: Common Reporting Errors to Avoid

ErrorConsequence
Missing data (e.g., dwell time)Audit failure, reinspection
Incorrect part IDTraceability failure
Ambiguous descriptionsMisinterpretation by evaluator
Failure to report an indicationUndetected defect โ†’ potential failure
Mixing observation and opinionReporting must be factual, not suggestive

โœ… Stick to what you see, not what you think it might be.


๐Ÿง  Summary of Key Points

  • Level 1 inspectors identify and report, not evaluate

  • Acceptance criteria come from codes, standards, or client specs

  • Use tools to measure and describe indications clearly

  • Maintain complete, clear, and traceable inspection reports

  • Your report is the foundation for decision-making and certification